I trans atlantici ci portano da una sponda all’altra del Atlantico.
Le trans azioni ci fanno superare le barriere di un contenzioso.
La trans essualità ci fa superare il limite del sesso.
Perché ci sentiamo respinti dalla transessualità ?
Perché è ‘contro natura ’. Ma non sono poche le specie animali ermafrodite o di sesso variabile nel tempo .
E, se il fenomeno non è raro anche nella specie umana , perché dichiararlo ‘contro natura’? Chi può arrogarsi il diritto di giudicare ciò che is natural and what is not?
Only those who were outside of nature. But who is?
So let loose the theme of 'natural' and admit that our refusal is essentially cultural . We can easily imagine a culture is not hostile towards transsexuality (as to the homosexuality, even to the pedophilia), in other words, a sexually uninhibited culture, without taboos. Perhaps we are moving towards such a culture. To get there, however, we should free ourselves from the 'masters of the sex', the religions (at least some) and the moral.
But
transsexuality is not just a problem of codes (moral, civic, religious), is primarily a problem of identity . But one is what it is, a mixture of variable elements male and female. In this sense each of us is to some extent transsexual. And if it's male or female male or female is simply a fact that concerned, and not something to evaluate positively or negatively. If anything, a mixture of characters may be more advantageous in dealing with the complexity real situations that a 'monosexuality' exclusive.
There is however the physiological question, undoubtedly the most difficult to address and resolve, when possible. Plastic surgery has certainly made great progress in recent years, thanks to experimentation in many transsexuals have undergone more or less voluntarily, but the partial results obtained are still far from corresponding to the expectations of applicants, too definitive characters primary sex in mammals.
Strangely enough, the 'common acceptance review commiseration with the malformation of an arm or a leg and nearly as scandalous waste a malformation of sexual apparatus. The so-called 'malformation'-which is nothing but a 'training' less likely, may not relate to the appearance of 'individual but only the internal distribution of hormones and here are the phenomena of homosexuality, transsexuality as well as all intermediate degrees of normality . Nor is justified interference by the moral and religions in matters which concern only the individual ego. But if it's just that I feel divided, not fully recognized, and this is because they lack the external recognition, should not own morality and religion first offer him this award on the same basis as any other?
If transsexuality is an illness, who is ill, the transsexual in its 'natural' or who's this 'natural' does not notice?
