The online site of ' Economist gave notice yesterday, in " The Economist Berlusconi wins lawsuit " to have won the civil suit in the Court of Milan which saw him opposite the Prime Minister from July 2001:
" In July 2001 Silvio Berlusconi, then prime minister of Italy, Launched in a lawsuit Italy alleging That The Economist defamed HAD HIM ITS in article "An Italian Story," Which Appeared In Our April 26th 2001 issue. The magazine cover bore the title: "Why Silvio Berlusconi is unfit to lead Italy". We are pleased to announce That the Court in Milan has issued a Judgement rejecting all Mr Berlusconi's claims and requiring HIM to make a payment for costs to The Economist. The full Judgement, in Italian, is available here. The Economist will not be making Any Further comment. Mr Berlusconi is prime minister of Italy Once Again. "
With English style usually occurs in the Economist not comment further.
But they say at home?
These titles TG1 last night:
1) exchange in the world for the sheer fear of U.S. recession
2) McCain sfida Obama: "il cambiamento sono io!"
3) Salva due bimbi che stavano per annegare e poi muore d'infarto per la fatica
4) In laboratorio il mondo dopo il Big Bang; gli esperti: "nessun rischio"
5) Succede in Gran Bretagna: pensava di avere cremato il padre 5 anni fa, lo rivede in televisione a "Chi l'ha visto"
6) Celentano consegna il "Leone d'oro" a Olmi.
A parte la notizia sacrosanta della morte eroica del nostro concittadino dopo avere salvato i due bimbi in difficoltà, pensiamo veramente che la consegna di un Leone d'oro o il ritrovamento di un pensionato a "Chi l'ha visto" sia più importante di conoscere the news and concrete terms Berlusconi Economist of the civil case? Certainly no
.
The city always has the right to know important things that concern the country's political life at the highest levels.
And then do not be surprised if the Italians are ignorant Italy and drowns in a deep moral decadence and material.
L ' information is the basic cornerstone of the regime . The scheme covers what to discomfort. " In July 2001 Silvio Berlusconi, then prime minister of Italy, Launched in a lawsuit Italy alleging That The Economist defamed HAD HIM ITS in article "An Italian Story," Which Appeared In Our April 26th 2001 issue. The magazine cover bore the title: "Why Silvio Berlusconi is unfit to lead Italy". We are pleased to announce That the Court in Milan has issued a Judgement rejecting all Mr Berlusconi's claims and requiring HIM to make a payment for costs to The Economist. The full Judgement, in Italian, is available here. The Economist will not be making Any Further comment. Mr Berlusconi is prime minister of Italy Once Again. "
With English style usually occurs in the Economist not comment further.
But they say at home?
These titles TG1 last night:
1) exchange in the world for the sheer fear of U.S. recession
2) McCain sfida Obama: "il cambiamento sono io!"
3) Salva due bimbi che stavano per annegare e poi muore d'infarto per la fatica
4) In laboratorio il mondo dopo il Big Bang; gli esperti: "nessun rischio"
5) Succede in Gran Bretagna: pensava di avere cremato il padre 5 anni fa, lo rivede in televisione a "Chi l'ha visto"
6) Celentano consegna il "Leone d'oro" a Olmi.
A parte la notizia sacrosanta della morte eroica del nostro concittadino dopo avere salvato i due bimbi in difficoltà, pensiamo veramente che la consegna di un Leone d'oro o il ritrovamento di un pensionato a "Chi l'ha visto" sia più importante di conoscere the news and concrete terms Berlusconi Economist of the civil case? Certainly no
.
The city always has the right to know important things that concern the country's political life at the highest levels.
And then do not be surprised if the Italians are ignorant Italy and drowns in a deep moral decadence and material.
0 comments:
Post a Comment