09.22.2009 The Parliament has approved the 2010 budget. Among the big paragraph 47 of the disapproval aroused 'Article 2. The above paragraph concerns the management of assets confiscated from the mafia and said that it is impossible to reuse them for public purposes can be sold. Sales activities are ensured by the State Property.
Let us, however, to take a step back about 13 years ago when the citizens have asked the Italian Parliament with petition to approve the Rognoni-La Torre Law 109/96 which allowed the use social goods confiscated from the Mafia. Million signatures were collected. The public affected by the period stragista that the mafia has put in place in the 90's well understood that a turning point would have been sanctioned by a collective awareness, every citizen of the rebellion against this form of organized crime also amply only a signature. Remove the assets from the Mafia, possession of these treasures and real estate sprouted from abuse, lace, murders, massacres, it meant helping to dismantle the excessive power of the clans based on an important economic asset.
Over the years these houses, these lands were confiscated have become schools, social centers, barracks. On land have worked for many unemployed young people are part of cooperatives aimed at social rehabilitation and grow local communities. Some land has been allocated to the school of Agriculture Corleone available to the cultural growth of young students, other possessions rather see as many young professionals, a large number coming from Tuscany, coordinated by associations which are committed to free land for rural work affirm the desire for redemption and freedom. Ideals have moved us this year that even if young Corleone for a few days. In short, the confiscated property is also not an economic but also social and tangible as Don Ciotti said ... multipliers positive planning. "
In recent years the recapture of assets of the mafia people have played an important role in prevention and support cultural and political action of the police and the judiciary. Against this amendment, and committed no known entries nell'antimafia have argued against the sale of assets, for several reasons one above all: these goods through the dummy could return domain mafia and undoing the work done so far, as stated by Angela Napoli component of national anti-Mafia commission.
Former Secretary Walter Veltroni and a group of parliamentarians from different political pd, pdl, udc, ldv, calling the amendment is withdrawn from the budget that provides the sale of seized property.
Rita Borsellino said in an interview that the sale of confiscated property: "It undermines the work done and it facilitates the mafia ... [.] The sale by auction must be averted. "
Our Mayor Dr. Iannazzo as the Prime Minister dr. Lanza are unanimous in expressing the 'inadequacy of the amendment. The Mayor write to Fini "I believe that this measure significantly weaken the action against the mafias and the subversive side that quote." Confiscate their wealth to the Mafia result in the loss of their power of intimidation and control of the territory, and demonstrates that the state is present. "
Yet the majority voted for the amendment to the Government, the Secretary Mantovano defends the rule: "...... is a residual hypothesis. If you still are not convinced that will do damage. But if we will not remove a drama. " And you
taxpayer to present or future taxes what about this ...? We citizens of a land still bent from the pain we are sure that this rule will not do damage? What are the advantages? Look
The Youth .... Corleone wonders and waiting for your comments .........
Angela
Representative List University
Let us, however, to take a step back about 13 years ago when the citizens have asked the Italian Parliament with petition to approve the Rognoni-La Torre Law 109/96 which allowed the use social goods confiscated from the Mafia. Million signatures were collected. The public affected by the period stragista that the mafia has put in place in the 90's well understood that a turning point would have been sanctioned by a collective awareness, every citizen of the rebellion against this form of organized crime also amply only a signature. Remove the assets from the Mafia, possession of these treasures and real estate sprouted from abuse, lace, murders, massacres, it meant helping to dismantle the excessive power of the clans based on an important economic asset.
Over the years these houses, these lands were confiscated have become schools, social centers, barracks. On land have worked for many unemployed young people are part of cooperatives aimed at social rehabilitation and grow local communities. Some land has been allocated to the school of Agriculture Corleone available to the cultural growth of young students, other possessions rather see as many young professionals, a large number coming from Tuscany, coordinated by associations which are committed to free land for rural work affirm the desire for redemption and freedom. Ideals have moved us this year that even if young Corleone for a few days. In short, the confiscated property is also not an economic but also social and tangible as Don Ciotti said ... multipliers positive planning. "
In recent years the recapture of assets of the mafia people have played an important role in prevention and support cultural and political action of the police and the judiciary. Against this amendment, and committed no known entries nell'antimafia have argued against the sale of assets, for several reasons one above all: these goods through the dummy could return domain mafia and undoing the work done so far, as stated by Angela Napoli component of national anti-Mafia commission.
Former Secretary Walter Veltroni and a group of parliamentarians from different political pd, pdl, udc, ldv, calling the amendment is withdrawn from the budget that provides the sale of seized property.
Rita Borsellino said in an interview that the sale of confiscated property: "It undermines the work done and it facilitates the mafia ... [.] The sale by auction must be averted. "
Our Mayor Dr. Iannazzo as the Prime Minister dr. Lanza are unanimous in expressing the 'inadequacy of the amendment. The Mayor write to Fini "I believe that this measure significantly weaken the action against the mafias and the subversive side that quote." Confiscate their wealth to the Mafia result in the loss of their power of intimidation and control of the territory, and demonstrates that the state is present. "
Yet the majority voted for the amendment to the Government, the Secretary Mantovano defends the rule: "...... is a residual hypothesis. If you still are not convinced that will do damage. But if we will not remove a drama. " And you
taxpayer to present or future taxes what about this ...? We citizens of a land still bent from the pain we are sure that this rule will not do damage? What are the advantages? Look
The Youth .... Corleone wonders and waiting for your comments .........
Angela
Representative List University
0 comments:
Post a Comment